jaynejani

its good to have sexy blogs on here,hopefully we can find someone via blogs,s/h seems only for couples

I've been thinking about that too. My blog seems to most popular, but that's probably because I've gone for engaging titles and also probably because all the guys are checking out if I am m or f!!!! My view is that this is a blog area for sexy stuff. Otherwise why is it here. yet I have been surprised by the lack of comments. Personally I'm interested in interactivity rather than simply mouthing off.

I thought this would a sexy blogging site since it's link the SH. I love to know what makes a woman tick, what makes her cum and what games she likes to play

I am a frustrated middle aged guy with a duckpond on my head,overhang onthe gut and with a body that if youabused yourself you too could have a body like mine. Also there is a feint hope that I can enjoy women,flirt and if I am really lucky have sex. So you have made an impression. long may it continue

Well you certainly made quite an impression on me... just a shame when I went to my inbox that there was no mail from you, but this male is certainly waiting for you xx

Some interesting thoughts there Jayne. I would have thought that it would be best if this site was for more sexually-overt/swinging blogs than general ones, as that is what it says on the tin, so to speak! People come here I would imagine for that side of things, not necessarily for non-sexual things. However on a slightly contradictory line, those non-sexual blogs and comments add to a 'community' feel and make the site friendlier, rather than just people posting 'naughty' things! As long as they don't distract too much from the original 'purpose' of this site :)

Hi JayneJani, How interesting, you are full of questions, but you don't volunteer too much about yourself. Maybe that's why most of your "comments" are not too constructive. It's very interestingt to compare the male and female stories on this site. Many of the male ones are excruciatingly direct. They go into lurid detail (especially the gay ones) about what was achieved between such-and-such couple when they met. Sometimes embarrassingly so. By contrast the female ones barely get started. They are so interested in asking crossfire questions that the main course isn't embarked upon. That's rather like real life. The men want to get down to it. When gay meets gay, down come the zips, and frequently the interplay is purely physical, without any emotional content. More's the pity, I suppose. But, Like it or lump it, that's the way men are. With women, they are so busy sussing out the ground rules and territory norms that action doesn't get under way. There must be a happy medium, if we could find it. Personally I am quite heavily into "telephone sex"; that is to say, I can "bring a woman off" just be talking to her sexily and seductively in an appropriate tone of voice. You doubt me? Rise to the challenge, Jayne! Call me on 02476 502077 and we'll see! And if you don't? Well, you'l;l be underlining what I've already said ~ that women prefer to skirting round the issue rather than confronting it. Now, there's a provocative and barbed remark!! Jeremy.

Hi Jayne, I'm repeating my comment, if only to ease out the typing errors which inadvertently I allowed to creep into the first print......How interesting, you are full of questions, but you don't volunteer too much about yourself. Maybe that's why most of your "comments" are not too constructive. It's very interesting to compare the male and female stories on this site. Many of the male ones are excruciatingly direct. They go into lurid detail (especially the gay ones) about what was achieved between such-and-such couple when they met. Sometimes embarrassingly so. By contrast, the female ones barely get started. They are so interested in asking crossfire questions that the main course isn't embarked upon. That's rather like real life. The men want to get down to it. When gay meets gay, down come the zips, and frequently the interplay is purely physical, without any emotional content. More's the pity, I suppose. But, like it or lump it, that's the way men are. With women, they are so busy sussing out the ground rules and territory norms that action doesn't get under way. There must be a happy medium, if we could find it. Personally I am quite heavily into "telephone sex", that is to say, I can "bring a woman off" just by talking to her sexily and seductively in an appropriate tone of voice. You doubt me? Rise to the challenge, Jayne! Call me on 02476 502077 and we'll see! And if you don't? Well, you'll be underlining what I've already said ~ that women prefer skirting around the issue rather than confronting it. Now, there's a provocative and barbed remark!! Jeremy.

Well that’s a challenge! How male! Should I stiffen the sinews and take the pose of the tiger? No I have no doubt the women that you talk to on the telephone have long and even multiple orgasms. Much to the delight of BT. But it’s just not my cup of tea, thank you never the less for the offer. As for the offering of information and the telling of tales normally of great conquest, I have heard both sexes tell a tale or two, some that can be believed and some that just bring a smile. When you compare a woman who enjoys two men to a man who enjoys two women – one is a slut and the other a stud! Sometimes, it is better to enjoy and smile than to boast and bring a smirk.

HOWEVER, Jeremy has raised a point, for some women is the thought or even the act of a sexual telephone call better than the thought of a face to face encounter? I can see the advantages and of course the disadvantages does anyone have a view?

AND, does this apply for the men? can a call be as exciting as an encounter of a more phisical nature how does the male find the right "button" to press on the telephone or will he say the same things to many different women untill they make the connection? (no pun intended)